CCTV footage exposes goa government, cbi SBI credit card fraud making FAKE CLAIMS about panaji gujju sex service provider cbi employee naina chandan

Few can match the goa government,cbi in their financial, credit card fraud making fake claims panaji gujju sex service provider cbi employee housewife naina chandan who looks like actress sneha wagh. CBI is paying a monthly salary to the gujju school dropout naina chandan, falsely claiming that the sex queen of panaji,naina who has never owned a credit card, owns the SBI credit card and domains of a single woman engineer,
CBI is repeating the lies of powerful ntro employees like tushar parekh, nikhil sha, parmar who are addicted to sex with naina and are abusing their powers.
The sbi credit card was used to book air tickets, which the cbi employee SEX QUEEN naina chandan has never booked since she is only in panaji and kolhapur,
CCTV footage will legally prove that SEX SERVICE PROVIDER CBI employee was always in panaji, she never came to mumbai from 7 january 2020, since she does not own the SBI credit, depends on the ntro, raw employees enjoying her SEX SERVICES to make fake claims, google, tata

Goa government can check the cctv footage of the CCTV in naina chandan’s house, which proves that their top panaji sex service provider school dropout naina chandan, never left goa on 7 january 2020, and stop their SBI CREDIT CARD FRAUD DUPING companies, countries and people with their fake claims

google, tata destroy the credibility of the hardworking person, paypal account holder so completely, Criminally defaming the person with FAKE STORIES that no one believes the person though he or she is telling the truth, everyone falsely claims to own their bank, ,paypal, account,credit card, domains and gets monthly raw/cbi salaries without doing any computer work, without investing any money online, in one of the greatest online frauds in India since 2010
it is one of the greatest psychological trick of google, tata, ntro,. that no one verifies whether the person telling fake stories has any proof against the person who is criminally defamed